2.25.2010

On Napping

Earlier this week a report was circulating on the Web about the benefits of napping. Since I am a serious napper, I read it with keen interest. It appears naps are good for the mind or as the BBC report headlined “Nap boosts brain learning power.” The study reported that 39 individuals who were allowed to snooze for a while after taking a “hard learning task” in the morning outperformed those who had to get through the day without a siesta.

However, we are not told how large the difference was or given much information about the process that led to the performance improvement. Dr. Matthew Walker of UC Berkeley who conducted the study said: “Sleep not only rights the wrong of prolonged wakefulness, but, at the neurocognitive level, it moves you beyond where you were before you took a nap.” This doesn’t seem to help me much.

A few years before, Dr. Martha Mednick reported similar findings in a study in which a nap that included REM (Rapid Eye Movement) sleep led to nearly a “40 percent improvement compared to the pre-nap performance on a word-association test. Individuals who didn’t experience REM sleep improved slightly, but their pre-and-post nap differences were modest and not statistically significant

These results also agree with my many years of napping experience. Since I rise early, a nap has become a bit of a necessity. I am totally refreshed after a short, mid-day nap. When I do really conk out for even a very short time, I actually feel much better after the nap than I did in the morning after a full night of sleep.

In a way, a mid-day nap really creates two separate days for me. There is the morning day and then the afternoon day and perhaps yet another evening day if I can manage that, something I’ve never really been able to achieve even when I needed to.

After I read the BBC report, I recall reading a delightful essay by Joseph Epstein on “The Art of Napping.” I searched without success for a copy in my files and I searched for copy on the Web, again without any luck. In doing so, I learned that the essay was included in book of Epstein’s essays, Narcissus Leaves the Pool.

I could order the book from Amazon but it would take weeks to arrive. Or I could walk a few blocks down to Powell’s to buy their one remaining copy. But it was rather too cold for me to venture out and besides the book would cost a fair amount and my bookshelf was running out of space anyway. What was I to do?

Lo and behold, Google Books came to my rescue. The complete essay is there and while I couldn’t print a copy or copy any passages, I could separately take notes while I read it, one page at a time. Doing that wasn’t so bad, at least it wasn’t reading the essay on my computer where note taking is easy. All this surprised me. Thank you Sergey and Larry. Perhaps one day it will be just as nice with some of the new e-readers that are currently making deep inroads on the reading experience.

Some well known individuals have been excellent nappers. Thomas Edison was said to be a superb napper and attributes much of his inventive energy to them. So was former President Bill Clinton, who was also known to be a voracious reader. No doubt, he also took advantage of his napping time to read for a while, as I do. Sometimes I think that is one of the reasons napping is such a treat for me

Other first-class nappers include Ronald Reagan, who seemed to be napping most of the day. Leonardo DaVinci for other much valued reasons also napped on and off during the day, but hardly slept at all at night. John D. Rockefeller also took a daily nap and for all I know may have regarded the experience as the royal road to wealth.

In his charming essay Epstein discusses the various ways napping affects his life. He recalls, “At the University of Chicago, I slept through the better part of the Italian Renaissance, or at any rate through a course in the history of art. As a teacher myself, I am now being justly repaid by having students fall asleep in my own classes.”

He also mentions some of the works of literature where it plays a lesser role. He cites Prince Bolkonsky’s comment in Tolstoy’s War and Peace, “A nap after dinner was silver, a nap before dinner golden.”

8 comments:

Stefanie said...

I am not a napper. I was in college. A ten-minute cat nap in the middle of the afternoon was refreshing. But then I had probably gotten up at 7 a.m after having gone to bed well after midnight. No more! I'm up at 5 during the week and between 5:30 and 7 on weekends depending when the sun rises. My job wouldn't appreciate it much if I napped in the afternoon and weekends I find unless I am really tired for some reason, a nap messes up my night time sleep.

Richard Katzev said...

Stephanie:

Yes, I know how hard it is to nap on the job. I always got a little bit sleepy after lunch in the days when I had a job, at least one that paid me for what I was doing and liking it enormously. But the sleepiness eventually passed which I remember thinking at the time how interesting that was. And I know there are some grounds for believing a mid-day nap can lead to a sleepless night, but I think that depends on the individual and the depth of the mid-day snooze.

Thank you for your comment,
The Napper

Richard Katzev said...

Stephanie:

Yes, I know how hard it is to nap on the job. I always got a little bit sleepy after lunch in the days when I had a job, at least one that paid me for what I was doing and liking it enormously. But the sleepiness eventually passed which I remember thinking at the time how interesting that was. And I know there are some grounds for believing a mid-day nap can lead to a sleepless night, but I think that depends on the individual and the depth of the mid-day snooze.

Thank you for your comment,
The Napper

Anonymous said...

Your latest blog entry went a long way toward advocacy of the debatable value of napping. It certainly induced me to doze off.

I am anxiously awaiting the next topic you might tackle; perhaps you will enlighten us with your position on the long-standing literary argument for eating an apple a day?

Richard Katzev said...

Anonymous:

A blog I like to read recently announced a new policy: "...no more anonymous comments. They will be rejected without further consideration. If you do not have the courage to stand up publicly for your ideas and feelings, you can express them elsewhere. From the start, the author of this blog has identified himself, and has been willing to take his lumps in the naked public square. It does not seem unfair to ask the same of those who would leave comments here."

www.marksinthemargin.com

Anonymous said...

Naps are good, restorative. Fitting them into the day? Not always so easy. Another proud napper was the great Winston Churchill, who some smirky liberal mouthpieces of the day also accused on perpetual napping. Cheers.

Sam said...

I spent the last 2 years doing full-time undergraduate studies and working fulltime. Napping was the key to my success.

I would come home from work and have a 2 hr nap before waking at 8-9pm and studying through till 1-2 am and then sleeping till 7:30 the next morning.

Richard Katzev said...

Sam:
Thanks a lot for your comment. I know exactly what you are talking about. And I have come to believe or at least wonder if we don't overemphasize the importance of long periods of sleep--8-10 hours. We sleep that long for reasons other than their purported health benefits, like it's cold in the winter and who wants to be up and around then?
Richard